tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post2080687220374357727..comments2023-10-18T03:53:59.377-04:00Comments on The Last Debate: Thanks For PlayingAndyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13524483460829802534noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post-53979740950601576092007-07-20T17:19:00.000-04:002007-07-20T17:19:00.000-04:00you could customize an iGoogle homepage and load a...you could customize an iGoogle homepage and load all of your feeds via their service. I am not sure if they load the content from their servers and them pipe it to you, or if they pull it directly from the websites. Anyway, might be worth trying.tnfpbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06131274962773321240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post-66177739189119078632007-07-20T16:32:00.000-04:002007-07-20T16:32:00.000-04:00Try bloglines. It's a great way to keep in touch ...Try bloglines. It's a great way to keep in touch when big brother is watching.Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00402032441340037301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post-66394501443553573672007-07-20T11:19:00.000-04:002007-07-20T11:19:00.000-04:00Andy: Stop working for people who abridge your ci...Andy: Stop working for people who abridge your civil liberties while posturing as philanthropic organisations. Seriously. Can't you work for someone who doesn't SUCK, for a change?DJRainDoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12921792163789635507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post-2232676460429928742007-07-20T10:15:00.000-04:002007-07-20T10:15:00.000-04:00harpers.orgmotherjones.comiht.comjoelderfner.com :...harpers.org<BR/>motherjones.com<BR/>iht.com<BR/>joelderfner.com :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post-42478998439288533722007-07-20T00:53:00.000-04:002007-07-20T00:53:00.000-04:00the British press doesn't think religion is off li...the British press doesn't think religion is off limits nor automatically laughable<BR/><BR/>the London Times, I recall, recently had some op-eds linked via my bioethics newslist (hence that fun photo gallery of Ascot hats for which I sent you the link ;) )<BR/><BR/>plus they culturally have such an interesting blend of "of course you should trust the establishment" and "of course you can't trust the establishment" ... Prince Charles shilling for organic farming is the poster image for me ... anyhow, weird tidbits that might actually be factual are less efficiently repressed in Britain I think. Perhaps due to their finely tuned sense of the absurd ... we are really too serious here. [Case in point: you read the NYT and CNN--to relieve work tedium ;) ???]<BR/><BR/>lu ;).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8387588.post-78660661364286513142007-07-19T15:00:00.000-04:002007-07-19T15:00:00.000-04:00I can see why the interviewer did that, but still,...I can see why the interviewer did that, but still, how incredibly unusual. At my previous job, I used to help in the interview process and we never rejected someone outright during the interview process. Even in the two instances where we knew we wouldn't be hiring the person less than five minutes into the interview, we didn't say anything and sent a "Thanks but no thanks" letter after the fact.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com