Thursday, December 18, 2008

Obama's First Huge Mistake

The selection of evangelical megachurch pastor Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at the inauguration of Barack Obama on January 20 is absolutely astonishing and tremendously disappointing.

President-elect Obama's defense of the choice is ironic: claiming that he wants to honor and represent the diversity of America, he has gone with a pastor who has stood in public opposition to that ideal.

Rick Warren is entitled to his religious views that homosexuality is incompatible with Scripture and to hold the belief that marriage should be between one man and one woman. He is even entitled to disregard all the available scientific research on the subject of sexual orientation and continue to maintain that homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice" that can be "treated." He was entitled to support California's Proposition 8 and to campaign on its behalf.

What Pastor Warren was not entitled to do, however, was to participate in a campaign of dishonesty about the "threat" the civil marriage of same-sex couples posed to religious freedom and freedom of speech. He claimed that any religious figure who spoke out against homosexuality or same-sex marriage could be "charged" with hate speech and fed the silly fear that churches would be "forced" to hold same-sex wedding ceremonies.

Either Mr. Warren does not understand his own first amendment rights that he claims to be so worried about, or he is a liar.

The legalization of civil marriage for same-sex couples does not restrict in any manner any person's fundamental right to speak in opposition. Just look how many people were censored or arrested for "hate speech" in California during the four months that same-sex marriage was legal there: zero. And how many pastors were forced to bless same-sex unions agains their deeply held religious beliefs? None.

It is true that Warren's rhetoric has been more moderate in tone than many other conservative religious leaders, but the content was no less poisonous. It is odious that in the name of "diversity" Barack Obama has given this honor to a person who used his pulpit to call for the elimination of existing rights for a minority population based on prejudice -- whether protected speech, or no.

Barack Obama's victory was in large part possible because the nation chose to soundly repudiate the politics of pander perfected by Karl Rove in targeting people like Rick Warren and his supporters. It is disheartening that this selection reinforces the notion that to be a credible religious figure in America one must be socially conservative. Why couldn't Obama have picked a progressive member of the clergy, like evangelical activist Jim Wallis? Or why not Katharine Jefferts Schori, the first woman presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church, who is also a scientist? Or perhaps a prominent African American scholar like Harvard's Peter Gomes?

Consider me extremely disappointed.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

FREE On-Demand TV Shows, Movies, Music(over 6 million digital quality tracks), Unlimited Games, Money, and FREE College Educations (Stanford, Oxford, Notre Dame and more) @ InternetSurfShack.com 

Andy said...

In the interest of respecting diversity of opinion, I'm going to allow that comment to stand.

kr said...

ewww. (a response to the Obama news, not the spam silliness.)

Silus Grok said...

What?!

I'm not exactly thrilled by the choice … but this guy isn't exactly making or enforcing policy. It's unfortunate. But his appointment of a former Iowa governor to head the department of agriculture is devastating. It's like putting a Detroit insider over the department of transportation. Worse, perhaps.

LeLo said...

I'm disappointed too, but I'm not surprised. That Warren believes and has spoken out for marriage being only between one man and one woman, well, Obama has said that too. Don't get me wrong: I'm an Obama supporter, but he was never overtly pro gay marriage and does stand on the same side of the issue as Warren. But what a frickin' disappointment. I would have hoped for better.

DJRainDog said...

Frankly, I'm furious, but I'm too busy and too tired to protest.

bskwfny said...

The Gaviota Leather by Hoka One One is a top-of-the-line leather walking shoe that provides firmer support than the Gaviota running shoe. This walking shoe offers premium cushioning, and the Hoka J-Frame provides maximum support and guidance without the use of traditional materials, which tend to be rigid and unforgiving. The Gaviota Leather features a proprietary EVA/rubber blend, further adding to the shoe??s durability. The Gaviota Leather is a comfortable take on a support shoe is perfect for everyday wear.Hoka shoes vans shoes brooks shoes brooks running shoes brooks running shoes

bskwfny said...

Brooks 1914 was born in Pennsylvania, USA. its head office is located in Seattle. It is dedicated to the research and development of professional sports shoes. It is the first professional brand to use the EVA midsole material necessary for sports shoes. At first, it only engaged in OEM business for other sports goods companies, such as springing. In 1972, Brooks officially launched its own brand products. After nearly 40 years of brand development, Brooks products cover all kinds of sports clothing and equipment, including running, football and so on.
The meaning of Brooks brand mark is "an endless extension of the road, a symbol of the road to victory for runners". It encourages people to actively participate in running, hoping to make runners run longer, farther and faster. Because each "step" has different meaning, it focuses on the development and innovation of each jogging device.
Welcome to our Brooks shoe store:
hoka running shoes
Running Shoes
brooks shoes
brooks running
vans
brooks running

bskwfny said...

Brooks 1914 was born in Pennsylvania, USA. its head office is located in Seattle. It is dedicated to the research and development of professional sports shoes. It is the first professional brand to use the EVA midsole material necessary for sports shoes. At first, it only engaged in OEM business for other sports goods companies, such as springing. In 1972, Brooks officially launched its own brand products. After nearly 40 years of brand development, Brooks products cover all kinds of sports clothing and equipment, including running, football and so on.
The meaning of Brooks brand mark is "an endless extension of the road, a symbol of the road to victory for runners". It encourages people to actively participate in running, hoping to make runners run longer, farther and faster. Because each "step" has different meaning, it focuses on the development and innovation of each jogging device.
Welcome to our Brooks shoe store:

hoka running shoes
Running Shoes
brooks shoes
brooks running
vans
brooks running

bskwfny said...

Hoka one one is a professional running shoes brand. This brand is from the United States. After being worn by many stars this year, it suddenly became popular in China. Let's learn about this brand.
Hoka one one is composed of outdoor enthusiasts Jean Luc diard and Nico Mermoud) co founded the sports brand in 2009. "We have always been very interested in the movement against gravity - for example, how to run faster, how to bring more freedom and so on," said Nico melmoud. "Breaking through the" desire for speed "in the downhill state is to give birth to Hoka one One of the ideas of the one brand. Melmord once pointed out that when they ran in the French Alps and other mountains, they had the idea of creating the brand.
Welcome to our Brooks shoe store:

hoka one one
hoka shoes
hoka one one
hoka one one
roger vivier
brooks running shoes