In the aftermath of last month’s catastrophic tsunami in south Asia and Africa, a lot of people find themselves asking questions. New York Times columnist William Safire perhaps phrased it best when he opened a column on the topic with the following: “Where was God? Why does a good and all-powerful deity permit such evil and grief to fall on so many thousands of innocents? What did these people do to deserve such suffering?”
Go ahead. Ask these questions. How can you hope to have any answers if you won’t ask the questions?
Some people, as in the case of one unfortunate letter writer to the Times, “wonder why they don't just accept the obvious conclusion that God does not exist.”
Oh really? Look at your body. Look at the incredibly complex system of systems that is a human being. Look at how it interacts with the various natural systems of our planet, and how our planet interacts with the universe. When you breathe, your lungs take in oxygen (and if you breathe through your nose, it passes through a hairy filter system to keep out impurities, meanwhile warming and moistening the air for comfort), and this oxygen is picked up by the circulatory system, which carries it to all the cells of your body, then picks up waste and carries it to the various organs that get rid of it. Your lungs expel carbon dioxide, which plants take in and convert to oxygen for us to breathe again.
This is an accident?
A mother’s body produces liquid food for newborn infants. This is an accident?
When you are hot, you produce sweat, which is not only a built-in cooling system, it’s part of your natural mechanism for expelling wastes and toxins. When you’re ill, you get a fever because the offending bacteria can’t survive at the higher temperature. This is an accident?
The gravitational pull of the moon affects the ocean’s tides, but it also demonstrably affects human behavior and women’s menstrual cycles. When women live together over a period of time, their cycles tend to synchronize. This is a coincidence?
Look at a rose. Or a tulip. Or a field of vibrant red Tuscan poppies. Or even a humble dandelion. A fresh strawberry. The sexual organs of plants. Human organs, too, bloom, grow and turn vibrant colors. One of the euphemisms for an orgasm is “seeing God.” Think about it.
Consider the origin of the planet. The conditions that are necessary to sustain life. Now look at Michelangelo’s sculpture of David. (You might even want to consider the marvelous, shimmering translucent marble of which the sculpture itself is made.) Consider the inspiration, the talent, the dedication necessary to make such an artifact. You would have me accept that all of this is the result of some geological, chemical and biological coincidence?
The plays of Shakespeare. The pyramids of Giza. The Apollo space missions. The music of Mozart. Think of all the individual instruments that make up an orchestra. Someone invented them. Someone else built them. Someone taught these musicians how to play. Somehow they all gather together to interpret a system of notation that reproduces a sound that Mozart heard in his mind. Listen to the silver voice of Kiri Te Kanawa singing “Dove sono.”
Have you ever been in love?
I could go on, and on, and on, and on.
And yet, if there is no God, then everything around us, every single thing that exists in the entire universe, you, and every person you know, is simply the product of random chance.
Frankly, that prospect is much more difficult for me to believe than the concept of an Almighty God.
So why, then, is there evil and suffering in the world?
I think this is beyond man’s capacity to understand. That is hard to accept. Man has an innate desire to understand his world and his surroundings, and to question things. If we didn’t, we’d still be in caves. (Though we wouldn’t even have primitive tools and cave paintings.) But if you accept that God designed the universe, from the vast complexity of galaxies and solar systems down to the iris of your eye which adjusts according to the light and helps you focus, then it’s not such a leap of faith to reach the conclusion that He knows what He’s doing.
A friend once explained it this way: have you ever seen needlepoint? When you look at it from the back – our perspective – it’s a big mess of knots, loose threads, loops and jumbled colors. It’s also backwards. But when you see it from the front – God’s perspective – the picture is perfectly clear.
But you know, if you accept this premise, you can spend some time staring at the jumbled, messy, backwards picture, and parts of it will begin to make sense.
So ask these questions. People who tell you not to question God have no faith. Really, they don’t. They don’t because they never asked the questions. They don’t know for themselves. They are afraid. They're afraid of being exposed as the self-righteous pontificating frauds they are.
It’s true that we use phrases like “putting the fear of God” into someone. In several places the Bible talks about the necessity of fearing God. But I don’t think living in quaking terror of the Divine is what is intended. I believe it’s more an issue of having respect for the ultimate power.
Whenever an angel appears in the Bible, his greeting is not, “Hey, how are ya?” but rather, “Fear not!” God himself uses this salutation. A quick search on an internet concordance reveals the phrase “fear not” occurs 139 times in the Revised Standard Version of the Bible.
The problem is that many people have expectations of God. That’s a little arrogant, don’t you think? Rather, He has expectations of us. We ask a question, and expect a quick, clear answer, as if by sometime this afternoon there will be an email from God@heaven.com, subject heading “re: Inquiry 943,302,524,239,120,873,320B-4” that begins, “Dear Supplicant, thank you for your recent inquiry regarding…”
Sometimes people don’t like the answers they get. But if you asked me, “Does this dress make my butt look fat?” and you don’t like my answer, you don’t doubt my existence.
People of many faiths spend their entire lives in prayer and meditation in an effort to achieve enlightenment. Many answers can be revealed. But I don’t think any mortal has ever comprehended the secret of the universe. When Moses ascended Mt. Sinai to receive God’s law, he was gone for forty days! And still there was a lot of ground that didn’t get covered.
Additionally, God has a tendency to refrain from speaking literally. Or literally speaking. Notice how Jesus communicated almost exclusively through parables. It’s not a sin to build your house on sand, it’s just not a very good idea. He also tended not to explain many of these parables; He left them for us to consider the lessons hidden within.
Incidentally, this is why I think one of the lessons of the parables is to caution against taking the Bible too literally. Jesus wasn’t really talking about fig trees. I am one of the people, like Galileo condemned by the church for heresy, that believes that science – theory of evolution included – is not at all in opposition to the idea of an all-powerful Creator. The fact that I don’t accept parts of Genesis as literally true does not mean that the contents are not, in some way, truthful. The Bible says God created Adam from the dust of the earth. Darwin says we are descended from monkeys. (Pardon the gross oversimplification.) But literally, what is your body? Carbon and water. So is a monkey’s. I don’t see that the two theories are mutually exclusive.
People who are afraid of the theory of evolution fear it because they have not bothered to ask God about it.
But let’s get back to the troubling, eternal question before us. If God is all powerful, if God is all-knowing, if God is Love, then why do pain and suffering exist? Wherefore tragedy?
Again, we come back to the unsatisfying answer that we mere mortals cannot see God’s full purpose. But if you check back with the Bible, you will see no mention anywhere that earthly existence is supposed to be free of suffering, free of loss, free of doubt. In fact, that is earthly existence. God does not owe you anything beyond what He has already abundantly provided you in His magnificent creation. He makes no promises to you regarding your time on earth. His promises concern your immortal soul. Stick with Him through this painful life, trust that you are in His hands, trust that He loves you, recognize His role in your life, and your eternal reward, like God Himself, will be beyond man’s capacity for understanding.
Look at Jesus’ life. He was poor. He was persecuted. He suffered a horrible death. His time on earth wasn’t all that great. Why should we expect our earthly lives to be any different?
Time out for a parable: twelve years ago, when I visited New York City for the first time, I had a turbaned Sikh cab driver take me Kennedy airport for my flight back to Oregon. He was chatty and I told him this was my first trip. He said, “Oh, and how do you like it?” I said, “Well…there’s a lot of really great things, and there’s some stuff that’s not so great, either.” He chuckled and said, “A coin that doesn’t have two sides isn’t worth anything.”
I think we, as humans, have this idea that our lives are the product of good things that happened in the past. You know, your parents met, fell in love, and here you are. Aw. But somewhere in your ancestral past, I am confident, there is horrible tragedy. War. Murder. Sickness. Natural catastrophe.
Say for example, you are Italian. Your family origins can be traced to the Tuscan hillside fortress-city of Siena. In the years between 1340 and 1350, statistics show that over 1,000 people a year died from bubonic plague. Somewhere in history, a distant relative of yours lost his entire family, everyone he knew, everyone he loved. Gone. “Perche, Signor?” he wailed. “Quanta miseria, sono solo nel mondo, ahime!” Hoping to escape from despair, he left the walled city and moved to a smaller rural hamlet. There he met a beautiful young woman and started a family. Seven-hundred years later, here you are.
Your mother’s family is from England. In the early 1700s a pretty young maiden was betrothed to a handsome admiral from a good family. Unfortunately, he was lost at sea in a terrible storm. She was devastated and heartbroken. For years she remained inconsolable. But then as fate would have it, one day she met another fine man who fell in love with her. They married, and it’s part of his DNA that you carry, not the drowned admiral’s.
You see, we are mostly unaware of the forces in the world that shape our lives. They are not always kind. They are not always gentle. The repercussions of catastrophes, natural and otherwise, stretch out over years, decades, centuries, and eons. The theory goes that an asteroid caused the death of the dinosaurs. Imagine for a second that that never happened. What chance would early humans have had in this world trying to co-exist with the T-Rex? We’ll never know.
This, inconveniently, brings us to the issue of predestination vs. free will. If everything is preordained, then we have no choice in our lives. And yet we know we do have choice. Still, if you go back to the top of this commentary, it’s hard to dismiss the concept of a divine blueprint for the universe. This conundrum, like so many other things, exceeds man’s capacity for conscious understanding, because human logic is not God’s logic. But I believe in the dimension in which God exists they are interrelated.
Jesus’ passion and death was the fulfillment of ancient Hebrew prophecies: predestination. And yet Judas chose to betray Him. Peter chose to deny Him. The crowd chose to release the murderer Barabbas. Pilate chose to acquiesce to the mob. In the Bible, destiny and free will are not in conflict.
What role does God play in our daily lives? This is a topic for heated debate. The Old Testament refers constantly to a city-smiting, flood-causing God whose habit of summary judgment had people dropping dead left and right and changing into pillars of salt. Punishment.
But then Jesus came. Show me a passage in the Bible where Jesus punished anyone. He criticized, he rebuked. He even got angry, when he chased the moneychangers out of the temple. He was God. He could restore a severed ear with the gentle touch of his hand, cure leprosy and blindness, and raise from the dead. One would assume he could also have pointed his finger and reduced sinners to a smoking heap. He never did. Jesus spoke of forgiveness.
Jesus cautioned us against storing up treasures for ourselves on earth. He taught that it is easier for a rich man to pass through the eye of a needle than to enter into Heaven. The plan could have called for him to be born to a wealthy and powerful family – the son of a king, perhaps. What tremendous influence He might have had then! But no, Jesus walked the earth as a poor man, relying on the charity of others for food and shelter.
Yet many people mistake wealth and earthly influence or success as signs of divine favor. If Jesus did not punish us while we lived, then neither did He reward us. There is one judgment, and one alone, and it comes at the end of days. (By the way, a note to Tim LaHaye and his ilk: St. Mark tells us, “No man knows the hour or the day,” chapter 13, verse 32.)
I do accept that God provides us with many opportunities to do His will, and that probably includes bringing us at times to places and positions of influence. Perhaps some people are, in fact, destined to lead. But they are still responsible for the decisions they make, as the lessons of Christ’s passion teach us.
In the wake of the 2004 election, many conservatives viewed Bush’s victory as a sign of God’s approval. Bob Jones wrote, “God has graciously granted America—though she doesn't deserve it—a reprieve from the agenda of paganism. You have been given a mandate. We the people expect your voice to be like the clear and certain sound of a trumpet. Because you seek the Lord daily, we who know the Lord will follow that kind of voice eagerly.” But if you accept this argument, you must also accept that God wanted Bill Clinton in charge for eight years. For that matter, God must have put Saddam Hussein in charge of Iraq for a while and chose Hitler to lead Germany. He must have brought Osama bin Laden to the position of extraordinary influence that he exerts in the middle east. An uncomfortable thought, yes? Why would He do that? Well, why last month’s tsunami? Why the San Francisco earthquake of 1906? Why cancer? Why aren't deluxe bacon cheeseburgers healthy?
I don’t know. You’ll have to ask God. Just be prepared to wait a millennium or so for the answer to become clear.
Personally, though, I don’t believe God needs to rig elections for His candidate to win. Just sayin’, is all.
And so we are called upon to stare tragedy in the face, and see what good we can make of it. This is our great task. The Lord asks of us to maintain faith, to not give in to despair, to trust His will, and to trust that when our motives are pure, that He will assist us in doing His work.
I turn now to the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001. Mere words cannot describe the agony of those hours. Why? How?
But in the few short days that followed, while the ruins still lay burning, a miracle manifested itself in plain sight. Can you think of any time in earth’s history when the entire planet was more united in an expression of grief, sympathy and solidarity? The whole world was convulsed in horror at the brutality and carnage. Billions grieved for the loss of strangers they could never have known. Here was a golden opportunity, such has come, truly, only once in the history of mankind. Yes, that is how singular that day was.
Christ commands us to reach out to our enemies. “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” (Matthew 5:44) Or, “Love your enemies and do good to those who hate you.” (Luke 6:27) “Do not resist one who is evil; if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the left also.” (Matthew 5:39) “To him who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also; and from him who takes your cloak, do not withhold even your shirt.” (Luke 6:29)
Now, that’s hard. That’s just very, very hard. Is it smart foreign policy? I don’t know, you’ll have to ask God. But for a President who claims to be guided by his Christian faith – and I freely confess I am in no position to doubt him nor have I authority to judge him – what Bush did next is hard to justify on a Scriptural basis. He chose war. Was that wise? Can any good come of it? Well, we’ll just have to wait, pray, trust and see.
Our daily lives are filled with miracles; we must just open our eyes to see them. Our daily lives are also filled with sorrow. Why?
You’ll have to ask God.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
It's not that I want to debate you on this, because we're talking about faith here, the very nature of which is that it CAN'T be proved. I think, whatever the reason, humans like mystery just as much as we like to solve them. And I've always believed that science is just as much a matter of faith as religion.
That having been said, our simple, yet magnificent existence does not innately prove that there is a god as you know it. It doesn't even prove the existence of the universal life force idea I'm rather fond of. I don't actually think people—people who study these things—are suggesting life was a matter of random chance. It was complicated, indeed, and relied on a series of specific events, to which the human animal responded and adapted.
Now, I'll admit, after I took a human bio class in college, I was prompted to rethink my athiest stance. Of course the complexity of the human body makes one think a higher intelligence was behind it all. But that also assumes it was all done in one shot, that Adam did indeed rise from the dust fully formed. It took time, one system developing after another as the need arose.
The existence of God or a god has just never felt "right" in me. Not right in the capital-R sense, but right in the way that will help me find my place in the universe. That to me is what spirituality is all about.
Now, what makes people so evil? I'mnot sure it's realyl all that complicated. I've had my own theories, revloving around expressions of cognitive dissodance and the inability to think outside of one's own experience, also known as selfishness. It's merely theory though from an admitted amateur psychologist.
What i'm not totally digging is this idea that it is "beyond man’s capacity to understand." I don't think that's true, and I think it's dangerous to accept. I also think it's dangerous to label certain aspects of human behavior as evil. That reeks of the kind of us-vs-them mentality that perpetuates all types of anti-productive activity. What I think we need to do is work harder to understand why we murder, why we wage war, why we can be so counter-intuitively self-destructive as a species and a society.
Now there's also a difference between natural distasters and world wars. Either way, though, we are left wondering why. I find when things happen that need fixing, the last thing I need to worry about is why. It's how do we fix it, then how do we make it not happen again.
Now what I love about Andy is his passion for this. I may not share his views but I do appreciate his intensity. I appreciate it so much I'm willing to overlook his unintentional pontificating.
wuv you andy
mark
i don't think there's anything accidental about the way we are and how we interact with our environment. Those of our ancestors whose bodies didn't sweat when they got hot, who weren't able to provide food for their young and who didn't get along with their environment simply didn't last long. I think you're missing the flip side of your own logic which says, we're so complicated we must have been designed this way! The flip side is that (because of, I don't know, radiation) there are a million designs, and most of them fail (a freak accident: a baby born without a heart, for example, wouldn't live to have children, right?). It's the ones who lucked out with a good design that survive and have kids. I'm not going to argue whether intelligent design or evolution is the actual event that happened, but you have to admit the logic of evolution, just as surely as one has to admit you can't disprove that a higher intelligence had a hand in it. Both are rather central tenents of logical thinking.
jwc
I do accept the logic of evolution but I might also suggest that, in the time that they existed, the "trial" species or whatever you want to call them, the ones that didn't survive, served a distinct role and fulfilled their part of the plan.
And it's not at all dangerous, I don't think, to suggest that many things exceed man's ability to comprehend. In fact, accepting that is quite a relief.
PS, and you're missing the main point of my blog, though admittedly it was so damn long and wide-ranging that I can't fault you for it.
The issue is: bad things happen to good people. Therfore, either God is an asshole, or he doesn't exist. I'm just arguing in favor of a third possibility.
Whoa...somehow you are under the impression that this is some kind of intellectual blog. ; )
Thanks to everyone for their comments so far...everyone has such brilliant things to say! Really, each of us experiences God in our own way, which I think is also part of the "plan." I think as long as it's sincere, it's valid. Maybe that's naive of me, but hopefully it's charmingly so.
I still think human existence proves the existence of God. I look around the world in which we live and can't accept that all of the things humans have done is merely the result of a series of freak events that resulted in the evolution of a species that just happened to be clever enough to learn how to fly and and dance and invent the internet etc. etc. And nothing else explains consciousness. What is the mind? What is guilt? What is love? What is anger? I mean, what ARE they? Where are they from?
I mean, science tells us all the "how" of everything, but it can never tell us the "why." I believe there is a "why."
But it's wonderful to see Americans talking about God without using hate speech or idiotic tired rhetoric. More please.
Oh, and if you doubt my moon assertions, you need to do more internet research. You might start here:
http://www.innerself.com/Astrology/full_moon.htm
I purposefully avoided a discussion of "evil" in this post because...well, it was long enough as it is. And I really wanted to stick to the theme of "why bad things happen to good/innocent people." It was largely a response to this awful piece that appeared on Slate that perhaps I should have cited in the original post:
http://slate.msn.com/id/2112083/
Keep it coming.
Misc factual argument re the Catholic Church: Galileo's heliocentrism
wasn't heretical (see his predecessor Copernicus), nor is your
evolution/creationism theory (specifically addressed by PJPII several
years ago because so many people _thought_ the Catholic Church
considered it heretical). If Galileo was a heretic (I can't remember if
he was convicted), it was because he considered "his" discoveries to
trump the authority of the Church's teachings. (As I recall, mostly he
was detained and tried for disobeying Church authorities, who recognized
a threat to the faith of the uneducated if he spouted of without any context.)
Jesus is recorded as taking a whip to those moneychangers. Whether he
actually hit them or just threatened them, whether it counts as a
"punishment," I don't know, but it probably should have not been ignored
in your Jesus was great argument.
The Diests, as a side point, were among those most horrified by
Darwinism--their whole dealio was that God set the world running and let
go. That whole change/development thing? No no no no. At first blush,
that seemed to require an active God or no god at all--certainly not
their god. (Of course, now we can argue that it doesn't require an
active God. Although I hear there are intersting mathematical analyses
that suggest that the rate of evolution, judged by the observed pace of
genetic abberation vs the observed fossil records/astronomical theories,
is not mathematically coherent--"we" have arrived on the scene WAY too
fast for "natural" processes. Which will probably also be disprovable
100 years from now :). ) The Catholic Church is very developmental in
its understanding of human development, so was less threatened by the
concept that that extended to biology. (Yes, I'm sure most Catholics
even in the heirarchy were threatened by Darwinism and its ilk--but the
actual teachings of the church were NOT. The Church, like every
institutionm is full of people of varying degreees of wisdom and learning!)
Your friends' arguments against your (beautifully articulated) "proof by
design" must be acknowledged as pieces of a fully convincing argument.
If God could be "proven," it would be merely a question of stupidity
whether to chose to put your faith in Him(/It/She/theOther/theDivine).
God has Himself provided us with this ultimate opportunity for the
excercise of our free will--in what else do we have more apparent
"power" over a proposed diety?
A high school friend once asked me, after I had articulated some of the
miraculous events I had experienced or been only one step removed from,
"If God exists, why would he give you all those experiences and not
everyone else?" Feeling impish, I replied, "Probably so I could bug
people like you."
I suspect, in the end, that is more accurate than not ;).
KR
Kirsten, as always I can count on you for an incredibly thoughtful response.
I sang 66 performances of the world premiere production of a Philip Glass opera entitled "Galileo Galilei." (I was one of the priests.) As a performer, I have always believed that the more information you have about your subject, however tangential, the better and deeper your interpretation. So I do know a little bit about the subject.
Galileo was in fact convicted of heresy by a Vatican tribunal for publishing a book that argued the sun was at the center of the universe; in the book of Joshua (chapter 10, verse 12...I don't have to look it up because in fact I sang an aria about it...broadcast live on NPR from the Brooklyn Academy of Music) it states clearly that God caused the sun to "stand still." Therefore, the sun moves, not the earth. He was threatened with torture (he was 71 and ill) and was forced to recant his works and was then sentenced to house arrest for the remainder of his days. Galileo did not at all believe that his experiments "trumped" church teaching, as evidenced by the many letters to his daughter Maria Celeste which are still in existence. He just argued that the authors of passages like that in Joshua could not possibly have known the way things really worked. The sun comes up in the east, travels across the sky, sets in the west. Therefore it moves. Science shows that's incorrect; it doesn't make Joshua "false" and it doesn't make God any less impressive.
The Church, however, was stuck on the worry that if Joshua 10:12 was not "true," then perhaps other passages were not "true." They could not accept the more esoteric argument that it was true from a certain point of view, but not literally and scientifically true. They did not pardon him until 1992.
Anyway, this all is tangential to the basic thrust of my all-over-the-place blog which, as I noted in a previous comment, was a response to the question of whether God actually existed, which always gets raised when terrible things happen. Science won't be able to prove the existence of God, I don't think -- as you pointed out, if they could, that would defeat the entire purpose of "faith" -- but at the same time, I wonder how people don't just open their eyes and see God everywhere in the world around them.
I am exceptionally proud of my friends' postings here, even though they disagree with me. They are pretty smart people. (I don't suffer fools gladly; it's one of my big shortcomings.) All I can say is, "Blessed are those who have not seen, and yet believed."
If I am going to put together an intelligent response to this, it is going to take me more time; I only work so quickly, and that speed tends towards slow. In the meantime, however, thank you. Thank you for writing this, and for the dialogue it encouraged.
Post a Comment